📷 Key players Meteor shower up next 📷 Leaders at the dais 20 years till the next one
NEWS
World War II

'American Sniper' as viewed by real American snipers

Jim Michaels
USA TODAY

WASHINGTON — For all the debate surrounding the movie American Sniper, few people know the moral choices involved in the job better than those trained to pull the trigger.

"His job is to strike a paralytic fear into the enemy," said Andrew Pedry, a Marine scout sniper section leader in Iraq in 2003.

For the sniper, killing is more personal, placing a heavy burden of responsibility on those that take up the profession. "It takes a lot of introspection, faith and care to wield that level of power," Pedry said.

Many welcome the movie, starring Bradley Cooper, for bringing a more realistic look at snipers on the modern battlefield, replacing the Hollywood myth of a rogue operator with that of a highly trained sharpshooter — and one with a conscience.

Their importance in the military has grown as they have proved their worth in Iraq and Afghanistan over the past decade.

"Snipers are the deadliest assets on the battlefield," said Dakota Meyer, a Marine scout sniper in Iraq in 2007 who received the Medal of Honor, the nation's highest award for valor, for actions in Afghanistan. "It's an asset to everybody."

But the movie has also generated criticism for "glorifying" war.

American Sniper, nominated for six Oscars, is based on the memoir of Chris Kyle, a Navy SEAL who became the deadliest sniper in U.S. military history. Kyle was later killed by a fellow veteran on a shooting range in Texas.

After the movie set box office records its opening weekend, filmmaker Michael Moore, tweeted that his uncle was killed by a sniper in World War II. "We were taught snipers were cowards," he said.

Meyer took offense. "How does a man who never served ... call the men and women who have the most skin in the game on behalf of our nation cowards," he said.

Moore's comments, which he later said were not directed at the movie, "did tap into a very long-running idea that sniping is not fair and Americans play fair," Pedry said.

Pedry said that public perception of the sniper has changed since Vietnam. Even Hollywood has picked up on it.

"From the colonial period through Vietnam, the sniper was not the hero," Pedry said. "In the John Wayne movies, he's not the sniper."

But the lengthy wars in Iraq and Afghanistan has prompted the public to recognize new military tactics of counter-insurgencies, Pedry said. Because of their precision, snipers have proven their worth in combat where insurgents often hide among civilians.

"Using snipers shows the greatest amount of restraint," said Jim Lechner, a retired Army lieutenant colonel who served alongside Kyle in Ramadi, Iraq. "Innocent people are not getting killed."

The change in public perception comes as sniper training has become more professional, and the equipment used by marksmen more sophisticated.

Sharpshooters have been around for centuries. In World War II a designated sniper might have been a farm boy who grew up hunting squirrels. But today's snipers are the product of training and technology that has made the profession as much science as art.

Some Army snipers have handheld ballistic computers that can calculate the impact of atmospherics on a bullet's trajectory.

Snipers have to calculate wind and other variables before taking a shot.

"This is a thinking man's game," said Marine Col. Tim Parker, commander of the Weapons Training Battalion, which oversees the sniper school at Quantico Marine base in Virginia.

The Marine sniper course is nearly three months long and the attrition rate averages about 50%. The course is both physically and academically demanding. "It's some of the toughest training in the world," Meyer said.

Students are taught sophisticated camouflage techniques and must crawl undetected across several hundred yards of terrain while instructors peer through binoculars in an attempt to see their movements. It can take more than five hours to move a couple hundred yards.

Students often have to replace their camouflage as the terrain and vegetation changes while crawling toward an objective.

"People who are comfortable in the woods and are used to being in the field have a natural tendency toward this craft," Parker said.

The refinements in training and technology have paid off. A sniper in World War II could be expected to hit an enemy target at about 600 yards. Today, snipers hit targets at twice that range.

Pfc. Robert Hamersly, left, and Pfc. Michael Trischler shoot at targets at the Army's Sniper School in 2012 in Fort Benning, Ga.

Marines and soldiers are also carefully vetted before being admitted to sniper school. Officers look for mature individuals who can operate often far from their unit without constant supervision and guidance.

That doesn't mean they are rogue — they have rules of engagement drummed into them before they set out on a mission. "It's got to be very specific criteria when they can take their shot," Parker said.

Killing isn't their only job. A key part of their mission is to provide intelligence or man observation points to protect conventional units as they move along a dangerous route.

But when they do kill, it has a psychological impact on the enemy. The fear of being killed by an unseen marksman is unnerving and eats away at an enemy's morale.

"As snipers we have a saying: 'Kill one, terrorize thousands,'" Meyer said.

In Ramadi, the efforts of snipers like Kyle helped prove to insurgents that they no longer controlled the city, once an al-Qaeda stronghold in western Iraq, Lechner said.

Snipers were employed widely in the city in 2006, helping to support conventional forces and countering insurgent sharpshooters targeting Americans.

"Chris was just one of many Navy SEAL snipers who were getting huge numbers of kills," Lechner said. "He was part of a large effort."

Featured Weekly Ad